Lions lose, but look sharper than in week 1

Sure, they lost. But the Detroit Lions didn't look too bad on Sunday. They were facing a tougher team than in the previous week, and the game was a lot closer.

The fact that they were able to take a 10-0 lead against what is arguably the best team in the NFC is a reason for confidence. Granted, blowing the lead to lose 27-13 was more like our typical Lions, but still.

Last year the Lions were a completely overmatched team. A defensive line coach for head coach, his son-in-law for defensive coordinator, an offensive line coach for offensive coordinator, a broadcaster for a general manager, you get the idea. They may still be a little short on talent, but at least they showed that they could compete.

They didn't lose because they were pitifully incompetetive. They lost because the Vikings are a powerhouse, and the Lions were still one of the league's less talented teams. But they aren't by any means completely terrible this year. On the offensive side of the ball, this is the first time in a while that the line has actually looked decent so far. Over on defense, the additions of Julian Peterson, Phillip Buchanon, Grady Jackson, Travis Henry, Larry Foote, and rookie safety Louis Delmas have helped them out. With Sims, Peterson, and Foote, the linebacking corps will likely be one of their most improved areas.

Basically, my goal here is to restate what I said last week: The Lions are an improving team. They aren't ready to be playoff contenders, but they are likely good enough to win some games this year.

They may have a chance next week at home against the Washington Redskins. Granted, the Redskins are a good team, but the game will be played at home, and it is probably the best chance they will have to avoid going 0-6. Especially considering the Redskins' sloppy 9-6 victory over the St. Louis Rams.

And as bad as the Lions are, the Rams are a lot worse.